Abstract:
Recently, increasing fragmentation of international law – expressed in the growing number of special-
ized norms, international organizations, and judicial bodies – has led to challenges in the global security
system. This article offers a critical examination of fragmentation as a multidimensional phenomenon
that encompasses normative, institutional, and procedural aspects of international legal regulation.
The aim of the article is to reconsider fragmentation through the lens of institutional crisis and
to explore its potential to create a flexible, multi-layered legal architecture at both global and regional
levels. The author argues that while fragmentation may undermine the coherence of international law,
it also offers a pragmatic framework for adapting legal systems in response to geopolitical instability and
normative diversity.
The study presents a structural analysis of fragmentation based on jurisprudence, treaty regimes, and
doctrinal sources. The novelty lies in viewing fragmentation as a manifestation of legal pluralism – one
that may function as a stabilizing force amid institutional decline and rising regionalism. Particular atten-
tion is paid to the role of fragmentation in the formation of regional and specialized security instruments.
It is argued that, under conditions of institutional crisis, fragmentation can serve as an effective model for
conflict resolution and sustained legal cooperation
